Composite vs wood at a glance
| Timber | Composite | |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront cost | Lower (£90–£150/m) | Higher (£120–£200/m) |
| Maintenance | Treat every 1–2 years | None (occasional wash) |
| Lifespan | 10–15 years | 20–30 years |
| Guarantee | Limited | 10–25 years |
| Rot & warp | Can rot/warp | Rot-proof |
| Look | Natural, varies | Uniform, modern |
When timber wins
Choose timber if your budget is tight, you're fencing a long boundary, or you like the natural look and don't mind treating it. It's also easier and cheaper to repair a single damaged panel.
When composite wins
Choose composite if you want a fence you can fit and forget, a clean modern finish, and the longest life. It pays back best when you plan to stay put and value never having to treat or replace it.
The bottom line
If upfront price is the priority, timber wins. If lifetime cost and zero maintenance matter more, composite usually comes out ahead. See full composite fencing costs, then compare local quotes for both.